| |
BGonline.org Forums
Internet Playing Site Wish List
Posted By: Jason Lee In Response To: Internet Playing Site Wish List (Michael Petch)
Date: Sunday, 23 December 2012, at 2:45 a.m.
I agree with the anonymity to a point. If you are expert players you want to know who you are playing (especially for ratings/money or whatever, and you don't want duplicate accounts). But I know a lot of social players for privacy reasons that don't wish to have their identities known. If I were to create a site, I'd opt for best of both worlds. In the advanced competitive rooms you require your identity to be known, in social areas, anonymity would still be an option. I think in this case you can have your cake and eat it too.
How would do you differentiate between an "advanced competitive room" and a "social room"? Is it just a label or are there substantive differences?
A label seems ok -- with stipulations that tournament matches such as those sanctioned by the USBGF should go in the competitive room. I can see just labeling things working fine, with people self-segregating as they see fit, and getting a different vibe from each area.
Same dice, though. =)
JLee
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.