BGonline.org Forums

64S-64X-32 versus 64S-41X-32

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Wednesday, 23 January 2013, at 1:47 a.m.

In Response To: Tips accepted — 64S-64X-32 (Taper_Mike)

–

64S-64X-32 Position ID: 4OvgASHgc+EBUA Match ID: cIkJAAAAAAAA

64S-41X-32 Position ID: 4GvwASHgc+EBUA Match ID: cIkJAAAAAAAA

I can’t say that my rollout of 64S-64X-32 will show anchoring as best — it’s still cooking — but for those who would anchor, I wonder whether you would do the same thing in this variant suggest by Timothy. If you would do something different in 64S-41X-32, I am interested to hear what features distinguish the two positions for you. Thanks. Mike

Messages In This Thread

• Tips accepted — 64S-64X-32
  Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 22 January 2013, at 6:48 p.m.
  • Tips accepted — 64S-64X-32
    konstantin -- Tuesday, 22 January 2013, at 7:08 p.m.
  • Tips accepted — 64S-64X-32
    Michael Nielsen -- Tuesday, 22 January 2013, at 7:20 p.m.
  • Tips accepted — 64S-64X-32
    Michael Depreli -- Tuesday, 22 January 2013, at 7:22 p.m.
  • Tips accepted — 64S-64X-32
    Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 22 January 2013, at 7:57 p.m.
  • Tips accepted — 64S-64X-32
    Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 22 January 2013, at 8:44 p.m.
  • 64S-64X-32 versus 64S-41X-32
    Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 23 January 2013, at 1:47 a.m.
    • 64S-41X-32 — Unlimited Games — 3ply XG2 Rollout
      Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 24 January 2013, at 8:51 p.m.
  • 64S-64X-32 — Unlimited Games — 3-ply XG2 Rollout
    Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 24 January 2013, at 8:33 p.m.