BGonline.org Forums

11 at 1a2a post-Crawford

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Wednesday, 23 January 2013, at 6:30 p.m.

In Response To: 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford (Ian Shaw)

In this situation I would just play 23/21(2). That cuts down on the gammon losses. I have trouble believing that your opponent would let you win here.

Messages In This Thread

• 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
  Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 23 January 2013, at 1:46 p.m.
  • 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
    Michael Depreli -- Wednesday, 23 January 2013, at 4:47 p.m.
  • 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
    Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 23 January 2013, at 6:30 p.m.
    • 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
      Sam Pottle -- Wednesday, 23 January 2013, at 6:58 p.m.
  • 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
    ah_clem -- Wednesday, 23 January 2013, at 7:05 p.m.
  • 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
    Adam Torkelson -- Wednesday, 23 January 2013, at 7:26 p.m.
  • 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
    Casper van der Tak -- Wednesday, 23 January 2013, at 9:21 p.m.
  • 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
    __1ERROR1__ -- Thursday, 24 January 2013, at 9:19 a.m.
  • 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 24 January 2013, at 5:48 p.m.
  • 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
    Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 24 January 2013, at 9:23 p.m.
  • 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
    Ian Shaw -- Friday, 25 January 2013, at 5:57 p.m.
    • 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
      ah_clem -- Friday, 25 January 2013, at 7:00 p.m.
      • 11 at 1a2a post-Crawford
        Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 25 January 2013, at 7:56 p.m.