BGonline.org Forums

Tough containment problem

Posted By: Daniel Murphy
Date: Monday, 4 March 2013, at 10:29 p.m.

In Response To: Tough containment problem (John O'Hagan)

Seems right to make the 12 point, blocking 3 numbers ... I'd play 16/13 14/12 and be pretty sure that's better than 14/12 6/3 (because of worse outfield coverage, mostly and the tight 16/14 15/12 for the same reason. 15/12 6/4 doesn't seem bad either. Is getting a checker to the 13 point worth 1/36 more hitting numbers? I think so.

Messages In This Thread

• Tough containment problem
  John O'Hagan -- Monday, 4 March 2013, at 3:14 a.m.
  • Tough containment problem
    David Rockwell -- Monday, 4 March 2013, at 4:50 a.m.
    • Tough containment problem
      Steve Mellen -- Monday, 4 March 2013, at 5:08 p.m.
    • Tough containment problem
      neilkaz -- Monday, 4 March 2013, at 5:51 p.m.
      • Oops
        neilkaz -- Monday, 4 March 2013, at 6:24 p.m.
  • Tough containment problem
    donby -- Monday, 4 March 2013, at 8:27 a.m.
  • Tough containment problem
    higonefive -- Monday, 4 March 2013, at 8:54 a.m.
    • Chouette diagram correction.
      higonefive -- Monday, 4 March 2013, at 10:06 a.m.
  • Tough containment problem
    Giuliano Pietoso -- Monday, 4 March 2013, at 10:38 a.m.
  • Monday I have Friday on my mind (the cube)
    svilo -- Monday, 4 March 2013, at 7:36 p.m.
  • Tough containment problem
    Daniel Murphy -- Monday, 4 March 2013, at 10:29 p.m.
  • Rollout
    John O'Hagan -- Tuesday, 5 March 2013, at 1:12 a.m.
    • Rollout
      higonefive -- Tuesday, 5 March 2013, at 8:20 a.m.
      • Rollout
        neilkaz -- Tuesday, 5 March 2013, at 4:01 p.m.