BGonline.org Forums

Third-roll Trio — xxP-33B-41

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Saturday, 9 March 2013, at 10:56 p.m.

In Response To: Third-roll Trio — xxP-33B-41 (Taper_Mike)

White has an advanced anchor so we have a strong inclination to split. The third one looks easiest to me: 61P-33B-41W. Unstacking the tall 6pt in front of White's anchor seems very natural.

I'm not so confident about the others. W doesn't look so good when it's the midpoint and not the 6pt that is too tall. The other candidates are D, U, and Z (convenience clause be damned!). I don't think D is right because we want to split. I guess I'd try Z in both cases because I want to unstack.

Messages In This Thread

• Third-roll Trio — xxP-33B-41
  Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 9 March 2013, at 1:34 p.m.
  • Third-roll Trio — xxP-33B-41
    Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 9 March 2013, at 3:34 p.m.
  • Third-roll Trio — xxP-33B-41
    David Levy -- Saturday, 9 March 2013, at 5:53 p.m.
  • Third-roll Trio — xxP-33B-41
    Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 9 March 2013, at 10:56 p.m.
  • 64P-33B-41 — 53P-33B-41 — 61P-33B-41 — 3-ply XG2 Rollouts
    Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 12 March 2013, at 1:19 a.m.
    • 64P-33B-41 — 53P-33B-41 — 61P-33B-41 — 3-ply XG2 Rollouts
      Chase -- Tuesday, 12 March 2013, at 3:59 a.m.
    • 64P-33B-41 — 53P-33B-41 — 61P-33B-41 — 3-ply XG2 Rollouts
      Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 13 March 2013, at 9:46 p.m.
      • How does S (Split) fare?
        Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 16 March 2013, at 10:34 a.m.