BGonline.org Forums

gnubg

Posted By: Mislav Radica
Date: Wednesday, 12 March 2008, at 10:45 p.m.

In Response To: gnubg (Daniel Murphy)

Now I like to check my errors with 4ply evaluations. I used to do 4ply analyze of all match with 4ply to get better prerequisites for rollouts but it was overkill as Albert Silver told me than. 2ply sometimes like to make unusual moves in bearing in in rather simple positions without contact so 4ply is much better than. I don't know that 3ply is fine for that. Also use 3ply for cube in classic holding positions.

4ply should be better than 2ply but much longer and in most cases equity differences are minor between 2ply and 4ply but sometimes are not and 4ply swing 2ply best plays.

Messages In This Thread

• gnubg
  pekfrench -- Monday, 10 March 2008, at 9:50 p.m.
  • gnubg
    Stick -- Monday, 10 March 2008, at 10:35 p.m.
    • gnubg
      pekfrench -- Monday, 10 March 2008, at 11:23 p.m.
      • gnubg
        Stick -- Monday, 10 March 2008, at 11:47 p.m.
        • gnubg
          Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 11 March 2008, at 4:38 p.m.
          • gnubg
            Mislav Radica -- Wednesday, 12 March 2008, at 10:45 p.m.
  • gnubg
    pontiac -- Tuesday, 11 March 2008, at 11:14 a.m.
    • gnubg
      Caryl Stephanson -- Tuesday, 11 March 2008, at 3:59 p.m.