BGonline.org Forums

Woolsey's law

Posted By: PersianLord
Date: Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 6:03 a.m.

In Response To: Woolsey's law (Matt Cohn-Geier)

In logic, we have the following :

If p>q is right, then ~q>~p MUST be right.

I didn't claim that the inverse of Woolsey's law is correct, but the anti-inverse (I don't know that real English name). In other words:

Woolsey's law:

If your opponent is unsure of taking/dropping (p), then you should double (q)

What's ~q>~p? It is:

You should NOT double (~q), if your opponent is SURE of taking/dropping (~p)

And that's my point.

Messages In This Thread

• Woolsey's law
  PersianLord -- Wednesday, 12 March 2008, at 11:53 p.m.
  • Woolsey's law
    Stick -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 12:00 a.m.
    • Woolsey's law
      neilkaz -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 4:57 a.m.
      • Woolsey's law
        Stick -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 5:05 a.m.
        • Woolsey's law
          neilkaz -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 3:14 p.m.
  • Woolsey's law
    Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 12:11 a.m.
    • Woolsey's law
      PersianLord -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 12:24 a.m.
    • Woolsey's law
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 1:34 a.m.
      • Woolsey's law
        Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 4:09 a.m.
        • Woolsey's law
          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 4:53 a.m.
          • Woolsey's law
            Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 4:57 a.m.
            • Woolsey's law
              Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 6:37 p.m.
              • Woolsey's law
                Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 9:17 p.m.
                • Woolsey's law
                  Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 10:21 p.m.
                  • Woolsey's law
                    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 10:54 p.m.
                    • Woolsey's law
                      Daniel Murphy -- Friday, 14 March 2008, at 1:52 a.m.
                      • Woolsey's law
                        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 14 March 2008, at 3:11 a.m.
      • Woolsey's law
        PersianLord -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 5:52 a.m.
        • Woolsey's law
          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 2:08 p.m.
  • Woolsey's law
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 1:41 a.m.
    • Woolsey's law
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 1:48 a.m.
      • Woolsey's law
        PersianLord -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 5:48 a.m.
        • Woolsey's law
          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 2:11 p.m.
    • Woolsey's law
      Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 1:53 a.m.
      • Woolsey's law
        PersianLord -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 6:12 a.m.
    • Woolsey's law
      PersianLord -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 6:03 a.m.
      • Woolsey's law and formal logic
        Stein Kulseth -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 10:36 a.m.
        • ... and use of the inverse phrasing
          Stein Kulseth -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 10:50 a.m.
        • Woolsey's law and formal logic
          PersianLord -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 10:59 a.m.
          • Woolsey's law and formal logic
            Stein Kulseth -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 11:08 a.m.
            • Woolsey's law and formal logic
              PersianLord -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 11:24 a.m.
              • Woolsey's law and formal logic
                Bryce -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 12:46 p.m.
              • Woolsey's law and formal logic
                Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 2:34 p.m.
      • Woolsey's law
        Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 4:29 p.m.
        • Woolsey's law
          PersianLord -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 5:07 p.m.
          • Woolsey's law
            Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 13 March 2008, at 6:41 p.m.