| |
BGonline.org Forums
Interesting prime v prime position
Posted By: niuniuch In Response To: Interesting prime v prime position (John O'Hagan)
Date: Friday, 27 March 2015, at 8:53 a.m.
This reminds me of a position from Magriels Backgammon that was revisited by Jeremy Bagai, except black didn't have an anchor there, only two blots. I wonder if a similar reasoning applies here also. Let's do the numbers.
If we play 6/4 6/2* pretty much all blacks entering numbers are very bad for him, but that leaves 16 shots where he stays on the bar and we are forced to go forward, probably covering the blot and maybe even breaking the 6 prime. If we play 8/4, any roll without a 6 forces him to break the prime, so he has only 11 good numbers, which that would make 8/4 by far the better 4. With the 2 I would play 6/4 which forces black to put me on the bar with the 6s making them a mixed blessing really. After any 6 but 61 we'll still probably be favourites to keep our prime longer than black.
MY play is 8/4 6/4.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.