Our gapped prime is way worse than the solid 5-prime. It's better to anchor up and try to attack if opp comes up to the gap. It's too dangerous to come up to 22pt. now (my play OTB).
1. | Rollout1 | 24/23 13/8 | eq: -0,139 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 46,13% (G:13,88% B:0,80%)
53,87% (G:14,87% B:0,60%) | Conf.: ± 0,014 (-0,153...-0,126) - [100,0%]
Duration: 7 minutes 43 seconds |
|
2. | Rollout1 | 23/22 13/8 | eq: -0,276 (-0,137) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 43,64% (G:14,29% B:1,12%)
56,36% (G:20,74% B:1,03%) | Conf.: ± 0,016 (-0,292...-0,261) - [0,0%]
Duration: 8 minutes 53 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout1 | 13/8 6/5 | eq: -0,352 (-0,213) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 41,80% (G:12,97% B:0,89%)
58,20% (G:19,99% B:1,04%) | Conf.: ± 0,015 (-0,368...-0,337) - [0,0%]
Duration: 8 minutes 05 seconds |
|
| |
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
In the variant below (3pt. shifted to 4pt.) our prime is good enough to compensate for the risk of opp's possible attack on our blot, so the 23/22 is correct here. Gaps make a big difference in prime vs. prime.
| 1. | Rollout1 | 23/22 13/8 | eq: +0,192 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 54,33% (G:18,19% B:1,43%)
45,67% (G:15,03% B:0,80%) | Conf.: ± 0,018 (+0,174...+0,209) - [100,0%]
Duration: 8 minutes 31 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 24/23 13/8 | eq: +0,153 (-0,039) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 53,80% (G:16,58% B:0,94%)
46,20% (G:13,04% B:0,59%) | Conf.: ± 0,013 (+0,139...+0,166) - [0,0%]
Duration: 7 minutes 15 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout1 | 13/8 6/5 | eq: +0,065 (-0,127) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 51,96% (G:16,01% B:0,93%)
48,04% (G:15,65% B:0,85%) | Conf.: ± 0,016 (+0,049...+0,080) - [0,0%]
Duration: 7 minutes 48 seconds |
|
| |
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
