BGonline.org Forums

opening reply

Posted By: Perry Gartner
Date: Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 4:48 a.m.

In Response To: opening reply (Alfred Mamlet)

I actually don't have a rollout of this nor do I feel one is necessary. I'm positive as Neil said that after an opening 41S the correct reply is 43X. (in case you're not familiar with nactation in old bg terms that's: 41S = 24/23 13/9, 43X = 24/21 6/2*)

The builder on the 9pt is too powerful to be left unfettered.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• opening reply
  Alfred Mamlet -- Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 2:03 a.m.
  • 41 split 43 ?
    neilkaz -- Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 2:37 a.m.
  • opening reply
    Perry Gartner -- Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 4:48 a.m.
    • opening reply
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 5:10 a.m.
      • opening reply
        Perry Gartner -- Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 5:14 a.m.
    • opening reply
      Tom Keith -- Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 11:28 a.m.
    • Do you ever tempo hit on the second roll if you can't make a major split?
      Perry Gartner -- Wednesday, 9 April 2008, at 2:52 p.m.
      • What about the 4-1 roll after 24/23?
        Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 9 April 2008, at 3:56 p.m.
        • What about the 4-1 roll after 24/23?
          Perry Gartner -- Wednesday, 9 April 2008, at 4:54 p.m.