BGonline.org Forums

Do you ever tempo hit on the second roll if you can't make a major split?

Posted By: Perry Gartner
Date: Wednesday, 9 April 2008, at 2:52 p.m.

In Response To: opening reply (Perry Gartner)

Stick, You sure know how to provoke a guy. So here's a principle we can use for determining when a tempo play is called for on the second move with a 4-1S. Tempo only when you can make a major split. This principle is a lock. I rolled out 4-1S,5-1 in 2006 on Snowie 3 and hitting was about.034 wrong. The rest of them are on your site and 4-3 was discussed in an earlier thread.

But,here's a challenge to you or anyone one else that's ambitious. Let us know all the other second roll responses when your only (viable) option is to tempo hit on the 2 or 1 where the principle of tempo hitting only when you can make a major split doesn't hold up! By the way,I don't know the answer but i will be disappointed if there is even one.

Messages In This Thread

• opening reply
  Alfred Mamlet -- Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 2:03 a.m.
  • 41 split 43 ?
    neilkaz -- Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 2:37 a.m.
  • opening reply
    Perry Gartner -- Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 4:48 a.m.
    • opening reply
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 5:10 a.m.
      • opening reply
        Perry Gartner -- Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 5:14 a.m.
    • opening reply
      Tom Keith -- Tuesday, 8 April 2008, at 11:28 a.m.
    • Do you ever tempo hit on the second roll if you can't make a major split?
      Perry Gartner -- Wednesday, 9 April 2008, at 2:52 p.m.
      • What about the 4-1 roll after 24/23?
        Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 9 April 2008, at 3:56 p.m.
        • What about the 4-1 roll after 24/23?
          Perry Gartner -- Wednesday, 9 April 2008, at 4:54 p.m.