It is likely that even for money 9, 3 comes out ahead. This is not an uncommon tactic when playing against a backgame (+ no board for the opponent) but I wouldn't have made that play here.
| 1. | Rollout1 | 13/9 8/3 | eq: +1.169 |
| Player: Opponent: | 71.56% (G:36.89% B:19.32%) 28.44% (G:3.38% B:0.44%) | Conf.: ± 0.008 (+1.161...+1.177) - [99.9%] Duration: 31 minutes 20 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 24/15 | eq: +1.151 (-0.018) |
| Player: Opponent: | 72.08% (G:35.48% B:17.16%) 27.92% (G:2.39% B:0.36%) | Conf.: ± 0.007 (+1.144...+1.159) - [0.1%] Duration: 30 minutes 50 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout2 | 13/4 | eq: +1.123 (-0.046) |
| Player: Opponent: | 70.37% (G:35.77% B:18.13%) 29.63% (G:2.84% B:0.24%) | Conf.: ± 0.015 (+1.108...+1.138) - [0.0%] Duration: 6 minutes 55 seconds |
|
| 4. | Rollout2 | 13/8 11/7 | eq: +1.112 (-0.058) |
| Player: Opponent: | 70.18% (G:35.40% B:16.69%) 29.82% (G:3.29% B:0.26%) | Conf.: ± 0.016 (+1.096...+1.128) - [0.0%] Duration: 6 minutes 56 seconds |
|
| |
1 2592 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Dice Seed: 5396289 Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
2 648 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Dice Seed: 5396289 Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|