BGonline.org Forums

Deduction from Related Cusp

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Monday, 4 January 2016, at 11:52 p.m.

In Response To: this should be a known position (Keene)

		White is Player 2 score: 0 pip: 163 Unlimited Game Jacoby Beaver pip: 149 score: 0 Blue is Player 1
XGID=aaB--AD-B---dD---d-e----B-:0:0:1:00:0:0:3:0:10
54S-62H-F-64P-F-C

The above position is a known double / no double cusp -- well, known by me, anyway, from older-bot rollouts. I'll roll it out (for Money) on XG to verify, and post.

Given that the doubling decision above is so close, the original position (with Blue owning his 4pt instead of 2pt) has to be an easy double. Yet the 4pt isn't so much stronger than the 2pt that White should seriously consider passing. In short, the original position (with Blue owning his 4pt) is a clear D/T

Nack

P.S. The diagrammed position can be reached in one fewer roll with 64P-54S-62H-F-C, but the 54S reply is a .03 error.

Messages In This Thread

• this should be a known position
  Keene -- Saturday, 2 January 2016, at 5:48 p.m.
  • this should be a known position
    Trunky -- Saturday, 2 January 2016, at 6:15 p.m.
    • this should be a known position
      Stick -- Saturday, 2 January 2016, at 6:48 p.m.
      • this should be a known position
        Keene -- Saturday, 2 January 2016, at 10:52 p.m.
        • this should be a known position
          Stick -- Saturday, 2 January 2016, at 11:13 p.m.
          • this should be a known position
            Keene -- Sunday, 3 January 2016, at 1:01 a.m.
          • this should be a known position
            Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 3 January 2016, at 7:30 p.m.
  • 42P-54S-62H-F cube.
    neilkaz -- Saturday, 2 January 2016, at 6:20 p.m.
  • this should be a known position
    Stick -- Saturday, 2 January 2016, at 6:47 p.m.
  • this should be a known position
    hominid -- Sunday, 3 January 2016, at 2:03 a.m.
  • Deduction from Related Cusp
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 4 January 2016, at 11:52 p.m.