1. | Rollout1 | 24/21 13/9 | eq: -0,032 |
| Player: Opponent: | 50,00% (G:7,71% B:0,34%) 50,00% (G:11,47% B:0,32%) | Conf.: ± 0,009 (-0,040...-0,023) - [100,0%] Duration: 1 hour 05 minutes |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 24/20 6/3 | eq: -0,056 (-0,024) |
| Player: Opponent: | 49,45% (G:6,66% B:0,31%) 50,55% (G:11,38% B:0,28%) | Conf.: ± 0,006 (-0,061...-0,050) - [0,0%] Duration: 1 hour 02 minutes |
|
| 3. | Rollout2 | 13/6 | eq: -0,073 (-0,042) |
| Player: Opponent: | 48,78% (G:7,04% B:0,28%) 51,22% (G:11,37% B:0,28%) | Conf.: ± 0,010 (-0,083...-0,063) - [0,0%] Duration: 29 minutes 36 seconds |
|
| 4. | Rollout2 | 13/9 6/3 | eq: -0,076 (-0,044) |
| Player: Opponent: | 48,67% (G:9,69% B:0,42%) 51,33% (G:13,39% B:0,51%) | Conf.: ± 0,009 (-0,084...-0,067) - [0,0%] Duration: 32 minutes 09 seconds |
|
| 5. | Rollout3 | 7/3 6/3 | eq: -0,130 (-0,099) |
| Player: Opponent: | 47,36% (G:8,74% B:0,40%) 52,64% (G:13,55% B:0,38%) | Conf.: ± 0,011 (-0,142...-0,119) - [0,0%] Duration: 14 minutes 15 seconds |
|
6. | Rollout3 | 6/3 6/2 | eq: -0,168 (-0,137) |
| Player: Opponent: | 47,03% (G:7,71% B:0,28%) 52,97% (G:14,52% B:0,39%) | Conf.: ± 0,013 (-0,181...-0,156) - [0,0%] Duration: 14 minutes 42 seconds |
|
| |
1 5184 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
2 2592 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
3 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
I still don't feel good about coming under that many attackers with the back guy, which is usually a very bad idea. But here that looks to be not much of a risk at all. He poh, we can cover the slot with 4x. He hits from the anchor, we can anchor up or return hit from the bar, look how bad his 5x (those which doesn't poh) play: 51, 53, 56. Can he hit loose inside his board efficiently? Look how awkward 21, 23, 26, 41, 43, 46 play for him.
The awkwardness of opp's responses makes the pure positional play of 24/21 13/9 worth it.