BGonline.org Forums

4pt vs 9pt 2

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Wednesday, 21 September 2016, at 12:28 a.m.

In Response To: 4pt vs 9pt 2 (Taper_Mike)

I'm not a native speaker of any hominid languages but I don't think that taking the sentence "I dont think this position is worthy of being in your 4pt vs 9pt problem book" at face value is the correct interpretation.

Note, for instance, that the hominid play differs from the bot play. "Not worthy" doesn't mean "the bot play is obvious" but rather something like, "it's obvious from the roll odds, and my 7-ply rollout concurs."

Messages In This Thread

• 4pt vs 9pt 2
  Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 18 September 2016, at 6:59 p.m.
  • 4pt vs 9pt 2
    Igor -- Sunday, 18 September 2016, at 7:17 p.m.
    • 4pt vs 9pt 2
      Casper Van der Tak -- Sunday, 18 September 2016, at 8:15 p.m.
      • 4pt vs 9pt 2
        neilkaz -- Sunday, 18 September 2016, at 9:59 p.m.
        • 4pt vs 9pt 2
          Taper_Mike -- Sunday, 18 September 2016, at 10:17 p.m.
          • 4pt vs 9pt 2
            neilkaz -- Monday, 19 September 2016, at 2:43 a.m.
  • I will do a DMP RO *NM*
    neilkaz -- Monday, 19 September 2016, at 3:05 a.m.
    • DMP RO
      neilkaz -- Monday, 19 September 2016, at 10:05 p.m.
  • 54S-21H-43H-52P-31P-F-C-54S-64R-42
    Taper_Mike -- Monday, 19 September 2016, at 8:05 a.m.
  • 4pt vs 9pt 2
    ah_clem -- Monday, 19 September 2016, at 8:58 p.m.
  • Rollout
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 19 September 2016, at 9:06 p.m.
  • 4pt vs 9pt 2
    hominid -- Tuesday, 20 September 2016, at 11:56 a.m.
    • 4pt vs 9pt 2
      Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 20 September 2016, at 3:53 p.m.
      • 4pt vs 9pt 2
        Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 21 September 2016, at 12:28 a.m.
  • 4pt vs 9pt 2 - Variant
    Stick -- Wednesday, 21 September 2016, at 10:42 p.m.
    • 4pt vs 9pt 2 - Variant
      Casper Van der Tak -- Thursday, 22 September 2016, at 11:39 a.m.
    • 4pt vs 9pt 2 - Variant - RO
      Karol Szczerek -- Monday, 10 October 2016, at 9:15 p.m.