BGonline.org Forums
Theoretical question: correct double below doubling point
Posted By: Casper Van der Tak
Date: Wednesday, 11 October 2017, at 7:47 p.m.
In Response To: Theoretical question: correct double below doubling point (Carlo Melzi)
I think it is a double because otherwise Blue's opponent has an efficient cube when Blue misses. It is a bit the same as 2-away 2-away where you always double as an underdog with market losers, unless you can roll really bad as well that you would have a substantial drop of the upcoming cube by your opp.
Messages In This Thread
- Theoretical question: correct double below doubling point
Carlo Melzi -- Wednesday, 11 October 2017, at 5:02 p.m.
- Theoretical question: correct double below doubling point
Tenland -- Wednesday, 11 October 2017, at 5:37 p.m.
- What is Gerard's paradox? *NM*
Sean Garber -- Wednesday, 11 October 2017, at 6:55 p.m.
- Theoretical question: correct double below doubling point
Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 11 October 2017, at 7:47 p.m.
- Theoretical question: correct double below doubling point
Florin Popa -- Thursday, 12 October 2017, at 8:38 a.m.
- Not all 59% are created equal
Michael -- Thursday, 12 October 2017, at 11:16 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.