[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Clarifying 'Almost solved', 'evidence[-based]'.

Posted By: higonefive
Date: Thursday, 21 December 2017, at 9:13 p.m.

In Response To: what evidence is there for computers having almost solved the game? (Bob Koca)

'Almost solved'(set in quotation marks, signifying the doubt about it) was used to address the fact, that the bots are a major tool for evalution AND a measurement to compare humans in their strengh. It will perhaps not fit in a strong sense for a mathematician or an analytical philosopher. What is evidence[-based]? It could also mean: "recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes." There is, in a strong sense, never an absolute, waterproof evidence. The word evidence is a 'rigid designator' for facts, overall accepted, but there is, as always, an 'implicit context'. But I would appreciate your pov to the approach of Marc B. Olsen.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.