BGonline.org Forums

Epistemology not epistomology

Posted By: higonefive
Date: Thursday, 21 December 2017, at 9:52 p.m.

In Response To: Epistemology not epistomology (Michael)

There is always an 'implicit context'. Even the analytic philosophers recognized it. But I'm happy, if will you correct faults. I tried my best, to describe the approach of Marc B. Olsen. It is a look above the edge of the plate. Just a typing error, excuse my. I'm after all still a little bit euphoric about this book.

Messages In This Thread

• An epistomology of Backgammon. Marc Brockmann Olsen. Backgammon: Pure Strategy.
  higonefive -- Thursday, 21 December 2017, at 6:32 p.m.
  • what evidence is there for computers having almost solved the game?
    Bob Koca -- Thursday, 21 December 2017, at 6:57 p.m.
    • Clarifying 'Almost solved', 'evidence[-based]'.
      higonefive -- Thursday, 21 December 2017, at 9:13 p.m.
  • An epistomology of Backgammon. Marc Brockmann Olsen. Backgammon: Pure Strategy.
    Michael -- Thursday, 21 December 2017, at 9:02 p.m.
    • Epistemology not epistomology
      Michael -- Thursday, 21 December 2017, at 9:09 p.m.
      • Epistemology not epistomology
        higonefive -- Thursday, 21 December 2017, at 9:52 p.m.
    • An epistomology of Backgammon. Marc Brockmann Olsen. Backgammon: Pure Strategy.
      higonefive -- Thursday, 21 December 2017, at 9:42 p.m.
    • An epistomology of Backgammon. Marc Brockmann Olsen. Backgammon: Pure Strategy.
      Phil Simborg -- Friday, 22 December 2017, at 1:49 p.m.
      • Thank you for your nice and competent answer.
        higonefive -- Friday, 22 December 2017, at 2:18 p.m.