I also played 6/3 for the same reasons but apparently White's attack is too strong. Correct is a safer 4/1! That way White doesn't have a direct way to pick up our second blot after a succesful attack so she wins far less gammons.
| 1. | Rollout1 | Bar/21 4/1 | eq: -0,661 |
| Player: Opponent: | 31,52% (G:9,09% B:0,29%) 68,48% (G:14,11% B:0,28%) | Conf.: ± 0,011 (-0,672...-0,650) - [100,0%] Duration: 2 minutes 13 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | Bar/21 6/3 | eq: -0,728 (-0,067) |
| Player: Opponent: | 35,11% (G:9,61% B:0,26%) 64,89% (G:25,11% B:0,38%) | Conf.: ± 0,010 (-0,738...-0,717) - [0,0%] Duration: 2 minutes 15 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout1 | Bar/21 7/4 | eq: -0,757 (-0,096) |
| Player: Opponent: | 33,65% (G:9,95% B:0,25%) 66,35% (G:23,43% B:0,56%) | Conf.: ± 0,011 (-0,767...-0,746) - [0,0%] Duration: 2 minutes 06 seconds |
|
| |
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
If we move Whit'e spare from her 6pt to 7pt so she has only 1s and 3s to attack (instead of 1s, 2s and 3s as in the OP), 6/3 becomes correct.
| 1. | Rollout1 | Bar/21 6/3 | eq: -0,350 |
| Player: Opponent: | 41,20% (G:9,37% B:0,22%) 58,80% (G:18,46% B:0,33%) | Conf.: ± 0,008 (-0,359...-0,342) - [100,0%] Duration: 3 minutes 57 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | Bar/21 4/1 | eq: -0,386 (-0,035) |
| Player: Opponent: | 38,44% (G:10,09% B:0,25%) 61,56% (G:11,83% B:0,26%) | Conf.: ± 0,007 (-0,393...-0,379) - [0,0%] Duration: 3 minutes 32 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout1 | Bar/21 7/4 | eq: -0,696 (-0,346) |
| Player: Opponent: | 34,75% (G:10,20% B:0,25%) 65,25% (G:22,79% B:0,59%) | Conf.: ± 0,010 (-0,706...-0,686) - [0,0%] Duration: 2 minutes 56 seconds |
|
| |
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|