An interesting play wins the contest. It's not even close at the score.
| 1. | Rollout1 | 24/23 8/4 | eq: -0,705 |
| Player: Opponent: | 30,05% (G:7,58% B:0,81%) 69,95% (G:27,27% B:6,33%) | Conf.: ± 0,022 (-0,726...-0,683) - [100,0%] Duration: 6 minutes 47 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 24/23 10/6 | eq: -0,802 (-0,098) |
| Player: Opponent: | 27,40% (G:7,47% B:0,86%) 72,60% (G:27,06% B:3,89%) | Conf.: ± 0,028 (-0,831...-0,774) - [0,0%] Duration: 3 minutes 12 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout1 | 13/12* 10/6 | eq: -0,875 (-0,170) |
| Player: Opponent: | 27,95% (G:7,87% B:1,33%) 72,05% (G:31,79% B:4,02%) | Conf.: ± 0,019 (-0,894...-0,856) - [0,0%] Duration: 5 minutes 52 seconds |
|
| 4. | Rollout1 | 13/9 13/12* | eq: -0,875 (-0,170) |
| Player: Opponent: | 28,93% (G:9,06% B:1,33%) 71,07% (G:35,93% B:7,48%) | Conf.: ± 0,021 (-0,896...-0,854) - [0,0%] Duration: 6 minutes 45 seconds |
|
| |
1 648 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
For money it's closer but still the top play holds. I had to move the cube to our side because otherwise we have to pass (per XGR++) next turn after any play.
| 1. | Rollout1 | 24/23 8/4 | eq: -0,479 |
| Player: Opponent: | 29,65% (G:7,22% B:0,37%) 70,35% (G:24,83% B:1,60%) | Conf.: ± 0,006 (-0,485...-0,473) - [100,0%] Duration: 11 minutes 10 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 24/23 10/6 | eq: -0,512 (-0,033) |
| Player: Opponent: | 26,42% (G:6,20% B:0,24%) 73,58% (G:18,68% B:1,02%) | Conf.: ± 0,006 (-0,517...-0,506) - [0,0%] Duration: 9 minutes 47 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout2 | 13/9 13/12* | eq: -0,610 (-0,131) |
| Player: Opponent: | 29,05% (G:8,52% B:0,72%) 70,95% (G:34,58% B:4,81%) | Conf.: ± 0,014 (-0,624...-0,596) - [0,0%] Duration: 3 minutes 04 seconds |
|
| |
1 2592 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
2 648 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
I've also tried a variant with our 5pt made instead of the 2pt. Still, 24/23 8/4 is best.
| 1. | Rollout1 | 24/23 8/4 | eq: -0,208 |
| Player: Opponent: | 41,71% (G:11,28% B:0,80%) 58,29% (G:25,70% B:7,23%) | Conf.: ± 0,017 (-0,224...-0,191) - [100,0%] Duration: 11 minutes 09 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 13/9 13/12* | eq: -0,316 (-0,108) |
| Player: Opponent: | 40,66% (G:13,13% B:2,74%) 59,34% (G:31,60% B:6,36%) | Conf.: ± 0,018 (-0,334...-0,298) - [0,0%] Duration: 10 minutes 50 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout2 | 24/23 10/6 | eq: -0,377 (-0,169) |
| Player: Opponent: | 36,52% (G:10,17% B:0,74%) 63,48% (G:23,35% B:4,67%) | Conf.: ± 0,031 (-0,408...-0,346) - [0,0%] Duration: 3 minutes 42 seconds |
|
| |
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
2 324 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
| 1. | Rollout1 | 24/23 8/4 | eq: -0,388 |
| Player: Opponent: | 41,30% (G:11,00% B:0,51%) 58,70% (G:22,32% B:1,51%) | Conf.: ± 0,015 (-0,403...-0,373) - [100,0%] Duration: 9 minutes 39 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 13/9 13/12* | eq: -0,463 (-0,075) |
| Player: Opponent: | 40,66% (G:13,38% B:1,09%) 59,34% (G:29,73% B:4,19%) | Conf.: ± 0,017 (-0,480...-0,446) - [0,0%] Duration: 10 minutes 23 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout1 | 13/12* 10/6 | eq: -0,490 (-0,102) |
| Player: Opponent: | 39,74% (G:12,60% B:0,88%) 60,26% (G:26,17% B:2,35%) | Conf.: ± 0,015 (-0,505...-0,474) - [0,0%] Duration: 9 minutes 55 seconds |
|
| 4. | Rollout2 | 24/23 10/6 | eq: -0,560 (-0,172) |
| Player: Opponent: | 35,75% (G:9,49% B:0,42%) 64,25% (G:17,96% B:0,95%) | Conf.: ± 0,029 (-0,588...-0,531) - [0,0%] Duration: 2 minutes 00 second |
|
| |
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
2 324 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|