[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Which is more aggravating & why?

Posted By: happyjuggler0
Date: Sunday, 15 June 2008, at 2:43 p.m.

In Response To: Which is more aggravating & why? (Stick)

Wow, you're awake? Why? I noticed a normal for you post on Kit's site from 3:30am PT.

Backgammon is more aggravating because there are bigger "bad beats" in bg.

Poker is more aggravating because the "bad beats" tend to be more decisive. They also seem to come more often, but in reality if one keeps the same definition in both games they don't, it only seems that way because we have a higher standard in bg for what we moan about (in general).

Poker is more aggravating because it can be boring as shit, while bg things are constantly changing and your mind keeps facing something new (and playable).

Backgammon is more aggravating because it is much harder to get a game at decent stakes online (or offline too I suppose, depending on where you live).

Backgammon is less aggravating because when you lose making the best plays you can Snowie (or gnu) them and know for your self, or prove to others, that your play kicked ass over the eventual winning play.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.