| |
BGonline.org Forums
Checker play problem
Posted By: PersianLord In Response To: Checker play problem (Daniel Murphy)
Date: Monday, 16 June 2008, at 8:58 a.m.
>>With gammon losses not counting as much at 0-0/3, there's less reason to advance the anchor
Why? If blue loses a gammon, he'll lose the whole match. But if he lose a single game, he'll be -3,-1 CR, so will have about 30% ME. So, IMHO, gammons do matter.
>>According to Dave's rollout, advancing the anchor is wrong anyway. If the rollout holds up, then we who move up have misjudged the balance of staying back to win more games vs. moving up to lose fewer gammmons.
As far as I see, 6/4(2) is better in both directions: winning more games and losing fewer gammons, so your argument doesn't hold.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.