BGonline.org Forums

22 to play

Posted By: Joseph Pregler
Date: Monday, 7 January 2019, at 3:21 p.m.

In Response To: 22 to play (Sebastiaan Kuijs)

The 1 negative I see about making the 9 point is making a point 6 away from the back anchor may be very hard to clear. So I am rejecting 11/9*(2), 6/2, although that is clearly the safest play.

I think we have to hit, so 11/9* is at least 1 of them. The 2 realistic choices are 11/9*/7 (2) for 11/9/2, 6/2. Both leave 18 return shots if I counted them right.

However, the first leaves 1 double shot (6/2) and the second leaves no double return shots. Additionally, the first leaves 4 fan numbers while the second play has 9 fan numbers. Therefore I choose the second play - 11/9*/7, 6/2.

Messages In This Thread

• 22 to play
  Sebastiaan Kuijs -- Saturday, 5 January 2019, at 10:33 a.m.
  • 22 to play
    Hans Marius Eikseth -- Sunday, 6 January 2019, at 11:29 a.m.
  • 22 to play
    benf -- Sunday, 6 January 2019, at 7:39 p.m.
  • 22 to play
    Joseph Pregler -- Monday, 7 January 2019, at 3:21 p.m.
  • 22 to play
    neilkaz -- Monday, 7 January 2019, at 6:55 p.m.
  • 22 to play
    ah_clem -- Tuesday, 8 January 2019, at 2:01 p.m.
  • VARIANTS and ROLLOUTS
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 29 January 2019, at 6:16 p.m.