Please note that in the third position the top move of the 4-ply evaluation differs from the top move predicted by the full roll-out. Please also note that in the third position in it is not clear (to XG at least) if the game will turn out to be a all out backgame or not. Whereas, the first two positions are instances of full backgames where even I can identify them as such.
| 1. | 4-ply | Bar/24 6/4* | eq: -0,0838 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 47,17% (G:10,29% B:0,51%)
52,83% (G:28,53% B:4,84%) | |
|
| 2. | 4-ply | Bar/24 11/9* | eq: -0,1005 (-0,0168) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 45,94% (G:10,81% B:0,55%)
54,06% (G:28,02% B:4,32%) | |
|
| 3. | 4-ply | Bar/23 8/7 | eq: -0,1070 (-0,0233) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 46,99% (G:7,87% B:0,35%)
53,01% (G:27,90% B:4,94%) | |
|
| 4. | 4-ply | Bar/23 6/5 | eq: -0,1108 (-0,0270) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 46,87% (G:8,00% B:0,36%)
53,13% (G:28,14% B:4,94%) | |
|
| 5. | 4-ply | Bar/23 5/4* | eq: -0,1109 (-0,0271) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 48,53% (G:6,77% B:0,32%)
51,47% (G:28,74% B:7,09%) | |
|
