The rollouts below say that the top play for money is different from the top play at gammon go. I don't fully understand what's going on. Even if I had been told that the top play for money differs from the top play at gammon go (without being told which is which), I might have gotten them reversed. 7/4 7/2 isn't obviously the more gammonish play, at least in my eyes.
         
 
          
 | | White is Player 2
score: 1
pip: 107 | 2 point match
Crawford | pip: 90
score: 0
Blue is Player 1 |
|
| XGID=-ABbCCBB-------aBa-bcbbb--:0:0:1:53:0:1:1:2:10 |
| Blue to play 53 |
| 1. | Rollout1 | 7/4 7/2 | eq: +0.468 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 66.11% (G:7.28% B:0.25%)
33.89% (G:4.66% B:0.19%) | Conf.: ± 0.003 (+0.464...+0.471) - [100.0%]
Duration: 55.7 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 16/13 16/11 | eq: +0.423 (-0.045) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 67.96% (G:3.18% B:0.05%)
32.04% (G:4.03% B:0.22%) | Conf.: ± 0.003 (+0.420...+0.426) - [0.0%]
Duration: 53.6 seconds |
|
| |
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Dice Seed: 271828
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.211.pre-release, MET: Kazaross XG2
Money:
| | White is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 107 | | Unlimited Game | pip: 90
score: 0
Blue is Player 1 |
|
| XGID=-ABbCCBB-------aBa-bcbbb--:1:-1:1:53:0:0:0:0:10 |
| Blue to play 53 |
| 1. | Rollout1 | 16/13 16/11 | eq: +0.271 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 68.43% (G:3.20% B:0.07%)
31.57% (G:5.98% B:0.21%) | Conf.: ± 0.005 (+0.267...+0.276) - [100.0%]
Duration: 1 minute 10 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 7/4 7/2 | eq: +0.235 (-0.037) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 64.09% (G:10.19% B:0.23%)
35.91% (G:7.43% B:0.32%) | Conf.: ± 0.006 (+0.229...+0.240) - [0.0%]
Duration: 1 minute 30 seconds |
|
| |
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Dice Seed: 271828
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.19.211.pre-release