As always, I try to include any reasonable plays that were mentioned in the comments. The play both 3 ply and 4 ply preferred was 15(2) 1 and had all other plays as basically a blunder. Not until XGR+ did the top two plays become so close. I don't believe any of the mortals even mentioned 15(2) 1 as a play.
| 1. | Rollout1 | 20/15(2) 11/6 8/3 | eq: +0.680 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 69.47% (G:5.03% B:0.06%)
30.53% (G:1.38% B:0.06%) | Conf.: ± 0.006 (+0.674...+0.686) - [99.4%]
Duration: 2 minutes 35 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 20/15(2) 11/1 | eq: +0.671 (-0.009) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 70.06% (G:2.25% B:0.02%)
29.94% (G:0.62% B:0.03%) | Conf.: ± 0.005 (+0.666...+0.675) - [0.6%]
Duration: 2 minutes 27 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout2 | 20/10*(2) | eq: +0.564 (-0.116) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 64.50% (G:11.42% B:0.20%)
35.50% (G:7.03% B:0.24%) | Conf.: ± 0.012 (+0.552...+0.577) - [0.0%]
Duration: 33.1 seconds |
|
| 4. | Rollout2 | 20/10* 8/3(2) | eq: +0.280 (-0.400) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 56.18% (G:20.37% B:0.59%)
43.82% (G:12.14% B:0.74%) | Conf.: ± 0.013 (+0.268...+0.293) - [0.0%]
Duration: 38.5 seconds |
|
| |
1 5184 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
2 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
