I am having trouble understanding this one also. A rollout with stronger play settings gives a similar result.
| 1. | Rollout1 | 24/23 9/6 | eq: -0.6654 |
| Player: Opponent: | 16.71% (G:1.34% B:0.02%) 83.29% (G:41.94% B:6.87%) | Conf.: ±0.0091 (-0.6745...-0.6563) - [100.0%] Duration: 1 hour 01 minute |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 24/23(2) 8/6 | eq: -0.6935 (-0.0281) |
| Player: Opponent: | 15.31% (G:1.21% B:0.01%) 84.69% (G:30.50% B:4.06%) | Conf.: ±0.0061 (-0.6997...-0.6874) - [0.0%] Duration: 1 hour 09 minutes |
|
| 3. | XG Roller++ | 24/23 8/5 | eq: -0.6789 (-0.0135) |
| Player: Opponent: | 16.05% (G:0.91% B:0.01%) 83.95% (G:34.53% B:2.13%) | |
|
| 4. | XG Roller++ | 24/23 9/7 6/5 | eq: -0.6967 (-0.0313) |
| Player: Opponent: | 15.16% (G:0.78% B:0.01%) 84.84% (G:35.34% B:2.09%) | |
|
| 5. | XG Roller++ | 24/23 8/6 3/2 | eq: -0.7042 (-0.0388) |
| Player: Opponent: | 14.78% (G:0.76% B:0.01%) 85.22% (G:37.96% B:2.70%) | |
|
| |
1 144 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. First 2 moves: XG Roller++, cube decisions: 3-ply Remaining moves: XG Roller+, cube decisions: 3-ply Search interval: Huge
|