For me personally I had no doubt that covering was correct but went with 21/20 for the ace. It didn't seem necessary to pick up an outfield blot that could only be hit by two fly shots and certainly could potentially be used later as a diversified builder or even a prime extender. 21/20 steps up into the super jokers of [33 11] for the opponent but still...
| 1. | Rollout1 | 8/7 8/2 | eq: +0.827 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 78.11% (G:37.92% B:0.66%)
21.89% (G:3.59% B:0.14%) | Conf.: ± 0.007 (+0.820...+0.835) - [100.0%]
Duration: 26.6 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 21/20 8/2 | eq: +0.787 (-0.040) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 77.22% (G:36.81% B:0.54%)
22.78% (G:4.02% B:0.18%) | Conf.: ± 0.007 (+0.780...+0.794) - [0.0%]
Duration: 27.4 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout1 | 8/2 7/6 | eq: +0.717 (-0.111) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 73.80% (G:38.84% B:0.59%)
26.20% (G:4.70% B:0.20%) | Conf.: ± 0.008 (+0.709...+0.724) - [0.0%]
Duration: 28.0 seconds |
|
| 4. | Rollout1 | 13/6 | eq: +0.637 (-0.190) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 73.42% (G:33.09% B:0.85%)
26.58% (G:6.63% B:0.27%) | Conf.: ± 0.008 (+0.630...+0.645) - [0.0%]
Duration: 32.0 seconds |
|
| 5. | Rollout1 | 21/14 | eq: +0.623 (-0.204) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 74.94% (G:27.05% B:0.65%)
25.06% (G:5.87% B:0.22%) | Conf.: ± 0.007 (+0.616...+0.630) - [0.0%]
Duration: 35.3 seconds |
|
| |
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
