| |
BGonline.org Forums
The significance of 3.679 (long)
Posted By: Daniel Murphy In Response To: The significance of 3.679 (long) (neilkaz)
Date: Thursday, 24 July 2008, at 12:24 a.m.
That was long! But thanks for the reminder that deep analysis of one match can take weeks of people and PC time, and that evaluations aren't the last word on error rates.
In the QF round at Monte Carlo, Karsten Neilsen and Joel Schiff played -3.3 and -4.5, according to evaluations. That indicates good play, but who knows what their "true" error rates were? Probably, no one ever will.
The match is at
http://www.dbgf.dk/Debat/filer/132698-Carsten_Schiff_2008_Monaco_QF.txt
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.