BGonline.org Forums
6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double?
Posted By: Bill Riles
Date: Friday, 25 July 2008, at 5:09 p.m.
In Response To: 6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double? (David)
disregarding match play score considerations my standard rule of thumb has always been
5 rolls -- no double
4 rolls -- double/take
3 rolls -- double/pass
Messages In This Thread
- 6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double?
David -- Friday, 25 July 2008, at 4:39 p.m.
- 6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double?
Bill Riles -- Friday, 25 July 2008, at 5:09 p.m.
- 6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double?
Keene -- Friday, 25 July 2008, at 5:09 p.m.
- 6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double?
jdg -- Friday, 25 July 2008, at 5:15 p.m.
- 6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double?
Stick -- Friday, 25 July 2008, at 6:02 p.m.
- 6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double?
Philippe Michel -- Friday, 25 July 2008, at 6:43 p.m.
- 6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double?
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 25 July 2008, at 6:45 p.m.
- Exact numbers
Petter Bengtsson -- Friday, 25 July 2008, at 7:13 p.m.
- Gnu confirms
rew -- Friday, 25 July 2008, at 7:26 p.m.
- 6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double?
Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 26 July 2008, at 3:12 a.m.
- 6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double?
neilkaz -- Sunday, 27 July 2008, at 12:15 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.