| |
BGonline.org Forums
6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double?
Posted By: Jason Lee In Response To: 6 rolls vs. 6 rolls = double? (Daniel Murphy)
Date: Tuesday, 5 August 2008, at 1:59 a.m.
193 rolls vs. 194 rolls is a beaver.
What seems counterintuitive at first does make sense, I think... in such a looooooooong race, ownership of the cube is extra valuable, since over that long period, you're likely to get a pretty efficient cube at some point. Do I have that right?
JLee
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.