BGonline.org Forums

65, 32, 53, 65 ?

Posted By: Marty Storer
Date: Friday, 5 September 2008, at 8:41 p.m.

In Response To: 65, 32, 53, 65 ? (pontiac)

I agree with 21/10, because forward prospects are better, and the game plan and overall position is more flexible.

Messages In This Thread

• 65, 32, 53, 65 ?
  pontiac -- Thursday, 4 September 2008, at 8:26 p.m.
  • 65, 32, 53, 65 ?
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 September 2008, at 10:40 p.m.
    • 65, 32, 53, 65 ?
      pontiac -- Thursday, 4 September 2008, at 11:26 p.m.
      • 65, 32, 53, 65 ?
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 4 September 2008, at 11:38 p.m.
  • 65, 32, 53, 65 ?
    MandM1951 -- Friday, 5 September 2008, at 11:12 a.m.
  • 65, 32, 53, 65 ?
    pontiac -- Friday, 5 September 2008, at 2:25 p.m.
  • 65, 32, 53, 65 ?
    Chuck Bower -- Friday, 5 September 2008, at 4:47 p.m.
  • 65, 32, 53, 65 ?
    Marty Storer -- Friday, 5 September 2008, at 8:41 p.m.