BGonline.org Forums

32D-62D-51 (even ply vs odd ply)

Posted By: John O'Hagan
Date: Thursday, 11 September 2008, at 4:08 a.m.

In Response To: 32D-62D-51 (even ply vs odd ply) (aoleg1)

I think White misplayed the 62 reply to Blue's opening 32D play. 18 & 11 would've been my choice. I vaguely remember seeing a RO of this play somewhere (can't remember where) showing split and down better by at least .03 over slotting or running. If splitting in the face of all those builders seems too risky to you, consider a 64 reply to an opening 43D play. Most of us would play 24/14 in a heartbeat but Stick's RO's show 18,9 to be just as good.

Messages In This Thread

• 32D-62D-51 (even ply vs odd ply)
  aoleg1 -- Wednesday, 10 September 2008, at 10:27 a.m.
  • 32D-62D-51 (even ply vs odd ply)
    pontiac -- Wednesday, 10 September 2008, at 2:19 p.m.
  • 32D-62D-51 (even ply vs odd ply)
    Mislav Radica -- Wednesday, 10 September 2008, at 11:25 p.m.
    • 32D-62D-51 (even ply vs odd ply)
      pontiac -- Wednesday, 10 September 2008, at 11:33 p.m.
  • 32D-62D-51 (even ply vs odd ply)
    John O'Hagan -- Thursday, 11 September 2008, at 4:08 a.m.
    • 32D-62D-51 (even ply vs odd ply)
      Stick -- Thursday, 11 September 2008, at 4:43 a.m.
      • 32D-62D-51 (even ply vs odd ply)
        John O'Hagan -- Thursday, 11 September 2008, at 2:08 p.m.