BGonline.org Forums

Re: Re: Post Crawford 2nd roll decision

Posted By: Ian Shaw
Date: Wednesday, 21 February 2007, at 1:23 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Post Crawford 2nd roll decision (Stick)

Your play could not have gained for you. If your opponent had correctly played on, you have less match equity, by definition. You only got back to 50% equity because your opponent made a mistake: by doubling.

I like your thinking though; you now merely have to find a play which induces the opponent to incorrectly play on. Then your gain is real.

Messages In This Thread

• Post Crawford 2nd roll decision
  Stick -- Tuesday, 20 February 2007, at 6:50 a.m.
  • Re: Post Crawford 2nd roll decision
    Ian Shaw -- Tuesday, 20 February 2007, at 9:35 a.m.
  • Re: Post Crawford 2nd roll decision
    Stein Kulseth -- Tuesday, 20 February 2007, at 10:49 a.m.
  • Re: Post Crawford 2nd roll decision
    Stick -- Wednesday, 21 February 2007, at 10:07 a.m.
    • Re: Re: Post Crawford 2nd roll decision
      Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 21 February 2007, at 1:23 p.m.
      • Re: Post Crawford 2nd roll decision
        Stick -- Wednesday, 21 February 2007, at 6:29 p.m.