| |
BGonline.org Forums
1st roll: 64: -2, -1 Post-Crawford?
Posted By: David Rockwell In Response To: 1st roll: 64: -2, -1 Post-Crawford? (Stick)
Date: Monday, 22 September 2008, at 3:57 a.m.
I think Bob's point is valid as it applies to 64R. After 64R, White will drop most rolls which don't hit. (66, 55, 44, 33 & 11 look like takes.) But, the same concept holds for the other two opening choices. You don't get to play when White rolls poorly. You have to look at all of the positions where you are a dog. I don't want to play 64P, 31P any more than 64R 42D for example. The same goes for 64S, 61P. All of them hurt. So, which hurts the least?
I've scanned the three opening choices roll by roll and my eyes can't pick a favorite. I'm guessing it is close. So, this may be a good time to play your opponent or personal preference, as Stick suggested.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.