BGonline.org Forums
1st roll: 64: -2, -1 Post-Crawford?
Posted By: Neil Robins
Date: Monday, 22 September 2008, at 1:16 p.m.
In Response To: 1st roll: 64: -2, -1 Post-Crawford? (Matt Cohn-Geier)
I like 24/18, 13/9 because I think most of the time you get to double the opponent out you have only gained a smaller advantage, so the average deficit on a take must be less.
Messages In This Thread
- 1st roll: 64: -2, -1 Post-Crawford?
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 22 September 2008, at 1:33 a.m.
- 1st roll: 64: -2, -1 Post-Crawford?
Stick -- Monday, 22 September 2008, at 1:50 a.m.
- 1st roll: 64: -2, -1 Post-Crawford?
alex213 -- Monday, 22 September 2008, at 8:01 a.m.
- 1st roll: 64: -2, -1 Post-Crawford?
pontiac -- Monday, 22 September 2008, at 11:56 a.m.
- Galddening Daniel's heart
Sam Pottle -- Monday, 22 September 2008, at 12:53 p.m.
- 1st roll: 64: -2, -1 Post-Crawford?
Neil Robins -- Monday, 22 September 2008, at 1:16 p.m.
- 1st roll: 64: -2, -1 Post-Crawford?
bob koca -- Wednesday, 24 September 2008, at 2:17 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.