BGonline.org Forums

Re: Backgame position 2

Posted By: Stick
Date: Sunday, 25 February 2007, at 7:33 a.m.

In Response To: Backgame position 2 (Ian Shaw)

Again, not that it really matters, but this is not a backgame. I'd play the simple 13/9(2) 6/2(2) though I could quite possibly be missing some esoteric play trying to kill numbers quicker. 13/9 with one of them is forced, that I'm sure of! =)

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• Backgame position 2
  Ian Shaw -- Saturday, 24 February 2007, at 9:28 p.m.
  • Re: Backgame position 2
    Stick -- Sunday, 25 February 2007, at 7:33 a.m.
  • Re: Backgame position 2
    Stein Kulseth -- Sunday, 25 February 2007, at 12:42 p.m.