BGonline.org Forums

Define "suck" quantitatively, please

Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Sunday, 26 October 2008, at 3:21 a.m.

In Response To: Define "suck" quantitatively, please *NM* (Chuck Bower)

>0.0 away from the best play.

I would have played 9/6 7/5 in that other position, but I was also so far off last time that I don't want to try to guess the equities here. 0.01 or 0.07 wouldn't surprise me.

Messages In This Thread

• You may have buriedn this, but I haven't
  Chuck Bower -- Friday, 24 October 2008, at 6:12 p.m.
  • You may have buriedn this, but I haven't
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 24 October 2008, at 6:13 p.m.
    • You may have buriedn this, but I haven't
      Stick -- Friday, 24 October 2008, at 6:29 p.m.
      • You two were meant for each other *NM*
        Chuck Bower -- Friday, 24 October 2008, at 7:48 p.m.
        • You two were meant for each other
          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 24 October 2008, at 10:21 p.m.
          • Define "suck" quantitatively, please *NM*
            Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 25 October 2008, at 7:24 p.m.
            • Define "suck" quantitatively, please
              Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 26 October 2008, at 3:21 a.m.
              • Define "suck" quantitatively, please
                Barry Silliman -- Sunday, 26 October 2008, at 5:20 a.m.
                • Define "suck" quantitatively, please
                  Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 26 October 2008, at 5:24 a.m.
  • You may have buriedn this, but I haven't
    garyo -- Friday, 24 October 2008, at 7:01 p.m.
  • You may have buriedn this, but I haven't
    misja -- Friday, 24 October 2008, at 10:17 p.m.