[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Define "suck" quantitatively, please

Posted By: Barry Silliman
Date: Sunday, 26 October 2008, at 5:20 a.m.

In Response To: Define "suck" quantitatively, please (Matt Cohn-Geier)

Matt, your nomenclature is certainly easier to memorize than Weaver/Ballard's:

  • 0.0-0.1 tied
  • 0.1-0.2 very close
  • 0.2-0.3 close
  • 0.3-0.6 wrong
  • 0.6-1.0 blunder
  • 1.0-2.0 whopper
  • 2.0+ double whopper
Matt's nomenclature:

0.00000000000001+ SUCKS!

Much easier to remember! :-)

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.