| |
BGonline.org Forums
This position shows why we prefer GNU for match play
Posted By: neilkaz In Response To: Preliminary Match Results w/Neil (Stick)
Date: Sunday, 26 October 2008, at 8:04 p.m.
My GNU agrees but we use almost same settings now. My Snowie agrees with 2.9 vs 1.4...I checked where the problem was and in this GG position where there's so little at stake. (I am dead) Snowie says that my 8/5 13/11 is worse than 13/11 13/10 by .147 !!! and that all plays are lots worse than 13/11 13/10.
The score (after 0 games) is: Stick 8, neilkaz 7 (match to 9 points, Crawford game)
Move number 4: neilkaz to play 23
Pip counts: Stick 94, neilkaz 137
Position ID: bLstBABYz8EDIA Match ID: 8AktAYAAOAAA
# Ply Move Equity 1 2 13/11 8/5 -0.7966 0.0951 0.0066 0.0000 - 0.9049 0.2888 0.0025 2 2 8/5 6/4 -0.7968 ( -0.0003) 0.0946 0.0070 0.0000 - 0.9054 0.3043 0.0025 3 2 13/11 6/3 -0.7993 ( -0.0027) 0.0934 0.0070 0.0000 - 0.9066 0.3353 0.0031 4 2 13/11 13/10 -0.8000 ( -0.0034) 0.0932 0.0068 0.0000 - 0.9068 0.2963 0.0033 5 2 13/10 6/4 -0.8015 ( -0.0050) 0.0920 0.0072 0.0000 - 0.9080 0.3236 0.0034 As usual I suspect that the lack of checker play according to score in the lookahead is screwing up Snowie here and that it may be going hunting for a needless G if I don't cover.
.. neilkaz .. as usual absolutely amazed that Snowie Group hasn't patched their fine product for checker play according to score !!
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.