BGonline.org Forums

66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play

Posted By: adambulldog
Date: Wednesday, 19 November 2008, at 12:10 a.m.

In Response To: 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play (Chuck Bower)

I think this is double-pass. With four checkers out of play, he can't develop a prime or an attack, so White's only game plan is to race his checkers around and off. His chances of doing that without being hit and contained are too slim methinks.

Messages In This Thread

• 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
  Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 18 November 2008, at 10:10 p.m.
  • 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
    Bill Riles -- Tuesday, 18 November 2008, at 10:30 p.m.
  • 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
    adambulldog -- Wednesday, 19 November 2008, at 12:10 a.m.
  • 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 19 November 2008, at 1:25 a.m.
  • 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
    pontiac -- Wednesday, 19 November 2008, at 1:41 a.m.
  • 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 19 November 2008, at 4:30 a.m.