BGonline.org Forums
66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Wednesday, 19 November 2008, at 4:30 a.m.
In Response To: 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play (Chuck Bower)
Good players find ways to choke White to death here, but the dice don't always cooperate with that plan. Note that White is breaking up badly on some 6's allready !
I doubt this is a take .. neilkaz ..
Messages In This Thread
- 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 18 November 2008, at 10:10 p.m.
- 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
Bill Riles -- Tuesday, 18 November 2008, at 10:30 p.m.
- 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
adambulldog -- Wednesday, 19 November 2008, at 12:10 a.m.
- 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 19 November 2008, at 1:25 a.m.
- 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
pontiac -- Wednesday, 19 November 2008, at 1:41 a.m.
- 66 isn't always a good roll, even when all four play
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 19 November 2008, at 4:30 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.