| |
BGonline.org Forums
Re: Candidates for voting
Posted By: Stick In Response To: Re: Candidates for voting (Chuck Bower)
Date: Wednesday, 14 March 2007, at 7:44 p.m.
So you know, I do 'next' like a fiend. You won't see any plays to vote on where you're simply shoving checkers around the board. If the play has nothing to really be learned from it/no close play (or for that matter, 5 plays that are all TCTC) I'll simply take Snowie 3 plys answer and move on. I don't feel this is anywhere close to a next, not because I'd consider making the 3 pt., that's silly, but whether you slot the bar point or the 4 pt. was my question.
I agree you can't objectively vote if you read others responses first, but I also don't really care. If you're here trying to learn you'll form your opinion, post your vote, read everyone else's, move on. If the crew just wanted to beat me silly everyone could check a bot before they voted and post it, fortunately I don't think any are doing that. The voting has seemed very real.
Stick
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.