BGonline.org Forums

Re: Opening 6-4 (2 pt.), 5-2 (split), 4-2

Posted By: Ian Shaw
Date: Friday, 17 November 2006, at 4:37 p.m.

In Response To: 64P-52S-42? (Stick)

Having made the deuce, it's very tempting to back it up by making the four point. The problem is that it overextends the forward position somewhat. It might be better to play 24/20 13/11 or 24/18, developing before White gets to unstack his builders. I'm never enthused about 24/18, but I think it's better than splitting to the 20 point. That leaves me back at the four point; 8/4 6/4.

Messages In This Thread

• 64P-52S-42?
  Stick -- Friday, 17 November 2006, at 8:58 a.m.
  • Re: Opening 6-4 (2 pt.), 5-2 (split), 4-2
    Ian Shaw -- Friday, 17 November 2006, at 4:37 p.m.
  • Re: Opening 6-4 (2 pt.), 5-2 (split), 4-2
    Black Swan -- Friday, 17 November 2006, at 4:57 p.m.
  • Rollout
    Stick -- Monday, 20 November 2006, at 3:17 a.m.
    • Re: Rollout
      Ian Shaw -- Monday, 20 November 2006, at 9:56 a.m.