BGonline.org Forums

GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf

Posted By: Stick
Date: Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:18 a.m.

In Response To: GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf (Tad Bright)

I'll admit it, I'm thoroughly lost. What's the point of this? The *hurumpf* makes me believe you don't like what GNU is telling you, and depending on what decimal place you have it out to, it may tell you you have anywhere from .000% chance of winning as white to .0002%. Don't be mad at GNU if you have it rounded off to 3 decimal places :)

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
  Tad Bright -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:04 a.m.
  • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
    Stick -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:18 a.m.
    • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
      Tad Bright -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 5:37 a.m.
      • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
        Stick -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 5:58 a.m.
        • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
          Tad Bright -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 6:12 a.m.
      • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
        Bill Riles -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 2:57 p.m.
        • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
          Stick -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:11 p.m.
          • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
            Bill Riles -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:24 p.m.
        • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
          Tad Bright -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 6:26 p.m.
  • Short Rollout
    Stick -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:49 a.m.
    • Hopefully,
      KenB -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 9:36 p.m.
  • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
    Stick -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:10 p.m.