BGonline.org Forums

GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf

Posted By: Tad Bright
Date: Monday, 12 January 2009, at 6:26 p.m.

In Response To: GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf (Bill Riles)

No. The dice are correct.

After his 66, me 66, him 61, me 66, him 21, me 65.

Messages In This Thread

• GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
  Tad Bright -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:04 a.m.
  • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
    Stick -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:18 a.m.
    • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
      Tad Bright -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 5:37 a.m.
      • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
        Stick -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 5:58 a.m.
        • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
          Tad Bright -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 6:12 a.m.
      • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
        Bill Riles -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 2:57 p.m.
        • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
          Stick -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:11 p.m.
          • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
            Bill Riles -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:24 p.m.
        • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
          Tad Bright -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 6:26 p.m.
  • Short Rollout
    Stick -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:49 a.m.
    • Hopefully,
      KenB -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 9:36 p.m.
  • GNU analysis 1.0. hurumpf
    Stick -- Monday, 12 January 2009, at 3:10 p.m.