BGonline.org Forums

Double for the match?

Posted By: Stick
Date: Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 12:10 a.m.

In Response To: Double for the match? (Rich Munitz)

Great analysis I only take issue with "Figure ... are gammons and 15% of white's (6%)." I think 6% is too high. We are on roll now and all our small numbers hit meaning our big numbers will move the forward checker around. In your scenario where we do get another shot again the aces are hitters and the big numbers run.

[66 55 44 22 65 64 62 54 52 42] - all the immediate missing numbers and the average is 10.25, far above the 8.16 (49/6 for MCG) average roll otherwise.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• Double for the match?
  Tad Bright -- Tuesday, 27 January 2009, at 6:18 p.m.
  • Double for the match?
    Stick -- Tuesday, 27 January 2009, at 6:37 p.m.
  • Double for the match?
    Frank_N_Stein -- Tuesday, 27 January 2009, at 7:05 p.m.
    • Double for the match?
      Bill Riles -- Tuesday, 27 January 2009, at 7:45 p.m.
    • Double for the match?
      Steve Mellen -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 1:52 p.m.
      • Double for the match?
        neilkaz -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 6:36 p.m.
  • Double for the match?
    Philippe Michel -- Tuesday, 27 January 2009, at 9:54 p.m.
  • Double for the match?
    Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 27 January 2009, at 10:32 p.m.
    • Double for the match?
      Stick -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 12:10 a.m.
      • Double for the match?
        Rich Munitz -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 8:11 p.m.
    • Double for the match?
      Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 1:08 a.m.
      • Double for the match?
        Rich Munitz -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 3:57 p.m.
  • Double for the match?
    jdg -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 6:22 p.m.
  • Rollout
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 29 January 2009, at 9:01 p.m.