BGonline.org Forums

Double for the match?

Posted By: jdg
Date: Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 6:22 p.m.

In Response To: Double for the match? (Tad Bright)

My immediate reaction is that this is not correct: 1) You don't always lose a gammon if you miss; 2) You often win a gammon if you hit.

I'd wait.

jdg

Messages In This Thread

• Double for the match?
  Tad Bright -- Tuesday, 27 January 2009, at 6:18 p.m.
  • Double for the match?
    Stick -- Tuesday, 27 January 2009, at 6:37 p.m.
  • Double for the match?
    Frank_N_Stein -- Tuesday, 27 January 2009, at 7:05 p.m.
    • Double for the match?
      Bill Riles -- Tuesday, 27 January 2009, at 7:45 p.m.
    • Double for the match?
      Steve Mellen -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 1:52 p.m.
      • Double for the match?
        neilkaz -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 6:36 p.m.
  • Double for the match?
    Philippe Michel -- Tuesday, 27 January 2009, at 9:54 p.m.
  • Double for the match?
    Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 27 January 2009, at 10:32 p.m.
    • Double for the match?
      Stick -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 12:10 a.m.
      • Double for the match?
        Rich Munitz -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 8:11 p.m.
    • Double for the match?
      Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 1:08 a.m.
      • Double for the match?
        Rich Munitz -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 3:57 p.m.
  • Double for the match?
    jdg -- Wednesday, 28 January 2009, at 6:22 p.m.
  • Rollout
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 29 January 2009, at 9:01 p.m.