BGonline.org Forums

2 ply/3 ply/4ply

Posted By: jdg
Date: Friday, 30 January 2009, at 2:51 p.m.

In Response To: 2 ply/3 ply/4ply (Stick)

Great: I had a question on this.

Pretty much everybody immediately saw 15-9 as an option, which is something that I've seen the bots recommend consistently in these? kind of positions.

Can you please give me a "why" and "position type" explanation as to what I should be looking for here?

jdg

Messages In This Thread

• NG-OLM Thurs. Jan 29th
  Stick -- Thursday, 29 January 2009, at 3:54 p.m.
  • NG-OLM Thurs. Jan 29th
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 29 January 2009, at 4:06 p.m.
  • NG-OLM Thurs. Jan 29th
    Petter Bengtsson -- Thursday, 29 January 2009, at 4:15 p.m.
  • NG-OLM Thurs. Jan 29th
    misja -- Thursday, 29 January 2009, at 4:17 p.m.
    • NG-OLM Thurs. Jan 29th
      Dan Pelton -- Friday, 30 January 2009, at 3:47 a.m.
  • NG-OLM Thurs. Jan 29th
    Havard Raddum -- Friday, 30 January 2009, at 8:20 a.m.
  • 2 ply/3 ply/4ply
    Stick -- Friday, 30 January 2009, at 8:26 a.m.
    • 2 ply/3 ply/4ply
      jdg -- Friday, 30 January 2009, at 2:51 p.m.
    • Rollout teachs GNU how to use checkers effectively
      neilkaz -- Friday, 30 January 2009, at 8:59 p.m.