BGonline.org Forums
NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
Posted By: Bill Riles
Date: Wednesday, 11 February 2009, at 9:31 p.m.
In Response To: NOT a contentious clock question, but instead... (Chuck Bower)
damn, you're no fun !! no controversy or anything
oh, well; okay
I'm hitting and slotting: 24/23*, 9/5. Probably ship next roll unless he picks up the two blots on 5 and 8.
Messages In This Thread
- NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 11 February 2009, at 9:08 p.m.
- NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
Bill Riles -- Wednesday, 11 February 2009, at 9:31 p.m.
- NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
John O'Hagan -- Wednesday, 11 February 2009, at 10:32 p.m.
- NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
garyo -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 1:48 a.m.
- NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
Stein Kulseth -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 9:21 a.m.
- Still time to voice your opinion...
Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 2:14 p.m.
- NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
Stick -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 2:33 p.m.
- NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
Coolrey -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 3:18 p.m.
- NOT a contentious clock question, but instead...
neilkaz -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 3:46 p.m.
- RO
Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 12 February 2009, at 6:06 p.m.
- RO
John O'Hagan -- Friday, 13 February 2009, at 2:56 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.